Friday, January 11, 2013

Social Media Etiquette: 12 Step Checklist

On January 9, 2013, Ilya Pozin contributed the following article to Forbes.com on social media etiquette.  I am guilty of reading something that I think is interesting and immediately posting it to Facebook. As I read more, I post more.  However, I am wondering if the volume reaches a point where it's too much.


As a communication tool, social media has a key role in society. On one hand, I embrace it. But on the other, I reject it.
I love social media for all the reasons many people do: I can connect with others who would normally be hard to reach, I can communicate quickly and creatively, I can find out what others are doing, and I can learn.
But there’s still a lack of etiquette many people possess when using social media. On sites like Twitter and Facebook, do all old-school means of social etiquette get thrown out the window? Or do most people not even know what classifies as proper social etiquette to begin with?
It was quickly confirmed through a string of Facebook messages that Goeckler’s friend died of a major heart attack. “I was not keen on the way I found out about the death,” she said. “It seemed so impersonal.”“There I was, sipping coffee one morning, when I saw a post from another former co-worker on Facebook,” Goeckler said. “It read something like, ‘Today, as I ride down the street on my bike, I think about how thankful I am to be alive. It is incidences like what happened to Brad this past weekend that make one stop, reflect, and cherish life.’ I thought to myself, ‘That seems odd, what is he referring to? Is this the Brad I know? Did something happen to him?’”
A few months later, Goeckler found out–also through social media–that a relative of hers had breast cancer. She says that finding this out via social media–not a phone call–was a disconnected and impersonal way to find out such serious news.
Both of the circumstances combined made me reconsider how we use social media. These two incidences were much bigger life events that may not have a place being blasted through with Facebook posts.
I do feel social media is valuable in many ways. But maybe we should teach etiquette to guide people on the best ways to use it as a communication tool. After all, like most technology, social media has been hoisted on our world with little or no instruction.
I encourage everyone to think before communicating through social media. Goeckler says everyone should ask themselves the following 12 questions before posting:
  1. Should I target a specific audience with this message?
  2. Use RecommendationsWill anyone really care about this content besides me?
  3. Will I offend anyone with this content? If so, who? Does it matter?
  4. Is this appropriate for a social portal, or would it best be communicated another way?
  5. How many times have I already posted something today? (More than three can be excessive.)
  6. Did I spell check?
  7. Will I be okay with absolutely anyone seeing this?
  8. Is this post too vague? Will everyone understand what I’m saying?
  9. Am I using this as an emotional dumping ground? If so, why? Is a different outlet better for these purposes?
  10. Am I using too many abbreviations in this post and starting to sound like a teenager?
  11. Is this reactive communication or is it well thought-out?
  12. Is this really something I want to share, or is it just me venting?
Run through these 12 questions in your mind–before clicking “post.” Trust me–you’ll be happy you double-checked before sharing with the world.

Monday, January 7, 2013

50 Redundant Phrases to Avoid

Stumbled upon an excellent and fun article by Mark Nichol on DailyWritingTips.com entitled "50 Redundant Phrases to Avoid".

Sadly, I am guilty of using many of them.

In conversation, it’s easy in the midst of spontaneous speech to succumb to verbosity and duplication. In writing, redundancy is less forgivable but fortunately easy to rectify. Watch out for these usual suspects:
1. Absolutely certain or sure/essential/guaranteed: Someone who is certain or sure is already without doubt. Something that is essential is intrinsically absolute. A guarantee is by nature absolute (or should be). Abandon absolutely in such usage.
2. Actual experience/fact: An experience is something that occurred (unless otherwise indicated). A fact is something confirmed to have happened. Actual is extraneous in these instances.
3. Add an additional: To add is to provide another of something. Additional is extraneous.
4. Added bonus: A bonus is an extra feature, so added is redundant.
5. Advance notice/planning/reservations/warning: Notices, planning, reservations, and warnings are all, by their nature, actions that occur before some event, so qualifying such terms with advance is superfluous.
6. As for example: As implies that an example is being provided, so omit “an example.”
7. Ask a question: To ask is to pose a question, so question is redundant.
8. At the present time: “At present” means “at this time,” so avoid the verbose version.
9. Basic fundamentals/essentials: Fundamentals and essentials are by their nature elementary, so remove basic from each phrase.
10. (Filled to) capacity: Something filled is done so to capacity, so describing something as “filled to capacity” is repetitive.
11. Came at a time when: When provides the necessary temporal reference to the action of coming; “at a time” is redundant.
12. Close proximity/scrutiny: Proximity means “close in location,” and scrutiny means “close study,” so avoid qualifying these terms with close.
13. Collaborate/join/meet/merge together: If you write of a group that collaborates or meets together, you imply that there’s another way to collect or confer. To speak of joining or merging together is, likewise, redundant.
14. Completely filled/finished/opposite: Something that is filled or finished is thoroughly so; completely is redundant. Something that is opposite isn’t necessarily diametrically opposed, especially in qualitative connotations, but the modifier is still extraneous.
15. Consensus of opinion: A consensus is an agreement but not necessarily one about an opinion, so “consensus of opinion” is not purely redundant, but the phrase “of opinion” is usually unnecessary.
16. (During the) course (of): During means “in or throughout the duration of”), so “during the course of” is repetitive.
17. Definite decision: Decisions may not be final, but when they are made, they are unequivocal and therefore definite, so one should not be described as “a definite decision.”
18. Difficult dilemma: A dilemma is by nature complicated, so omit difficult as a modifier.
19. Direct confrontation: A confrontation is a head-on conflict. Direct as a qualifier in this case is redundant.
20. End result: A result is something that occurs at the end, so omit end as a modifier of result.
21. Enter in: To enter is to go in, so throw in out.
22. Estimated at about/roughly: An estimate is an approximation. About and roughly are superfluous.
23. False pretense: A pretense is a deception, so false is redundant.
24. Few in number: Few refers to a small number; do not qualify few with the modifier “in number.”
25. Final outcome: An outcome is a result and is therefore intrinsically final.
26. First began, new beginning: A beginning is when something first occurs, so first and new are superfluous terms in these cases.
27. For a period/number of days: Days is plural, so a duration is implied; “a period of” or “a number of” is redundant. It’s better to specify the number of days or to generalize with many.
28. Foreign imports: Imports are products that originate in another country, so their foreign nature is implicit and the word foreign is redundant.
29. Forever and ever: Ever is an unnecessary reduplication of forever.
30. Free gift: A gift is by definition free (though cynics will dispute that definition), so free is extraneous.
31. Invited guests: Guests are intrinsically those who have an invitation, so invited is redundant.
32. Major breakthrough: A breakthrough is a significant progress in an effort. Though major is not directly redundant, the notable nature of the event is implicit.
33. [Number] a.m. in the morning/p.m. in the evening: The abbreviations a.m. and p.m. already identify the time of day, so omit “in the morning” or “in the evening.”
34. Past history/record: A history is by definition a record of past occurrences, and a record is documentation of what has already happened. In both cases, past is redundant.
35. Plan ahead: To plan is to prepare for the future. Ahead is extraneous.
36. Possibly might: Might indicates probability, so omit the redundant qualifier possibly.
37. Postpone until later: To postpone is to delay. Later is superfluous.
38. Protest against: To protest is to communicate opposition. Against is redundant.
39. Repeat again: To repeat is to reiterate an action, so again is unnecessary.
40. Revert back: Something that reverts returns to an earlier state. Back is superfluous.
41. Same identical: Same and identical are just that (and that). Omit same as a qualifier for identical.
42. Since the time when: Since indicates a time in the past; “the time when” is superfluous.
43. Spell out in detail: To spell out is to provide details, so “in detail” is repetitive.
44. Still remains: Something that remains is still in place. Still is redundant.
45. Suddenly exploded: An explosion is an immediate event. It cannot be any more sudden than it is.
46. Therapeutic treatment: Treatment in the sense of medical care is by nature therapeutic, so the adjective is redundant.
47. Unexpected surprise: No surprise is expected, so the modifier is extraneous.
48. Unintended mistake: A mistake is an inadvertently erroneous action. The lack of intention is implicit.
49. Usual custom: A custom is something routinely and repeatedly done or observed, and usual is redundant.
50. Written down: Something written has been taken down. Down is superfluous.

At the end of the article there's a link to another article by Catherine Osborn entitled "Eliminating Superfluous Phrases".

Also, guilty as charged!

In classes I have taught, students lean towards using phrases that they think make them “sound smarter” but end up making their work wordy and clunky. By streamlining your sentences and cutting out a few phrases, you can communicate your point much more effectively.


For example, here is a list of some that crop up frequently:
  • Needless to say…” If it’s so needless to say, then why are you saying it?
  • It goes without saying…” Same problem here; easier to get right to your point
  • For all intents and purposes…” Again, this could easily be cut and your sentence would begin with exactly what you intend to say.
  • In light of the fact that…” You could easily just say “Since…”
Clear concise writing applies to all genres and helps your audience understand your point without being bogged down.




 

Sunday, January 6, 2013

A Digital Legacy?

Back in March of 2011, my dear brother-in-law, Barry Faye, passed away.  It was a sad event.  We conducted a beautiful funeral service and talked about him for several weeks following.

Six months later, I received a reminder of his birthday on Facebook.  Going to his Facebook page, I saw that several people who apparently had not received notification of his death, posted birthday wishes.   My wife wrote a message on his page to inform "friends" that Barry had passed away.

Since that time, I periodically get requests to play "Words with Friends" with Barry.

Unfortunately, we don't know Barry's passwords so that we can't access his account to stop it.

The question about what happens to our online identity after we die is the subject of a very informative article in The Wall Street Journal, "Life and Death Online: Who Controls a Digital Legacy" 

According to the article, "...U.S. and Canadian laws, which are similar for the most part, don't treat digital assets like physical ones that can be distributed according to wills. In 1986, Congress passed a law forbidding consumer electronic-communications companies from disclosing content without its owner's consent or a government order like a police investigation. Although that law predates the rise of the commercial Internet, courts and companies have largely interpreted it to mean that the families can't force companies to let them access the deceased's data or their accounts."

The article points out "Today, some people share passwords so others can access their accounts after death, or write clauses into their wills, though the legality of either is unclear. 

To find documentation and best practices from on-line account providers on how to close, transfer or change accounts of deceased users, go to Deceased Account.com.


This is definitely an issue that needs to be addressed.  In the meanwhile, I have shared my passwords with my loved ones.

By the way, I usually just agree to "terms and services."  Check out this South Park which pokes fun at that practice. 
 

Thursday, December 27, 2012

The impact of Jews on Christmas songs


While stumbling around the Web, I began researching how many Christmas/Holiday songs were written by Jews. I found a site that listed the 25 Most Popular Holidays Song of 2008 as Determined by Radio Airplay and Compiled by the American Society of Composers and Publishers (ASCAP). Each song is followed by the writer and performer of the version that receives the most current radioplay.

The names in red are those individuals in which there was a verified citation to their religious background.

Interesting to learn that 12/25 can be attributed to Jewish individuals.

1.     Winter Wonderland
Written by: Felix Bernard, Richard B. Smith
Performed by: Eurythmics

2.
The Christmas Song (Chestnuts Roasting on an Open Fire)
Written by: Mel Tormé, Robert Wells
Performed by: Nat "King" Cole

3.
Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas
Written by: Ralph Blane, Hugh Martin
Performed by: The Pretenders

4.
Sleigh Ride
Written by: Leroy Anderson, Mitchell Parish
Performed by: The Ronettes

5.
Santa Claus Is Coming To Town
Written by: Fred Coots, Haven Gillespie
Performed by: Frank Sinatra

6.
Let It Snow! Let It Snow! Let It Snow!
Written by: Sammy Cahn, Jule Styne
Performed by: Michael Bublé

7.
White Christmas
Written by: Irving Berlin
Performed by: Bing Crosby

8.
Jingle Bell Rock
Written by: Joseph Carleton Beal, James Ross Boothe
Performed by: Bobby Helms

9.
Rudolph The Red Nosed Reindeer
Written by: Johnny Marks
Performed by: Gene Autry

10.
Little Drummer Boy
Written by: Katherine K. Davis, Henry V. Onorati, Harry Simeone
Performed by: The Harry Simeone Chorale & Orchestra

11.
It's The Most Wonderful Time Of The Year
Written by: Edward Pola, George Wyle
Performed by: Andy Williams

12.
Rockin' Around The Christmas Tree
Written by: Johnny Marks
Performed by: Brenda Lee

13.
Silver Bells
Written by: Jay Livingston, Ray Evans
Performed by: Kenny G

14.
I'll Be Home For Christmas
Written by: Walter Kent, Kim Gannon, Buck Ram
Performed by: Amy Grant

15.
Feliz Navidad
Written by: José Feliciano
Performed by: José Feliciano

16.
Frosty The Snowman
Written by: Steve Nelson, Walter E. Rollins
Performed by: The Ronettes

17.
A Holly Jolly Christmas
Written by: Johnny Marks
Performed by: Burl Ives

18.
It's Beginning To Look A Lot Like Christmas
Written by: Meredith Willson
Performed by: Johnny Mathis

19.
Blue Christmas
Written by: Billy Hayes, Jay W. Johnson
Performed by: Elvis Presley

20.
(There's No Place Like) Home For The Holidays
Written by: Bob Allen, Al Stillman
Performed by: Perry Como

21.
I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus
Written by: Tommie Connor (PRS)
Performed by: John Mellencamp

22.
Here Comes Santa Claus (Right Down Santa Claus Lane)
Written by: Gene Autry, Oakley Haldeman
Performed by: Elvis Presley

23.
Carol Of The Bells
Written by: Peter J. Wilhousky, Mykola Leontovich
Performed by: David Foster (instrumental version)

24.
Do They Know It's Christmas? (Feed the World)
Written by: Midge Ure (PRS), Bob Geldof (PRS)
Performed by: Band Aid

25.
This Christmas
Written by: Donny Hathaway, Nadine McKinnor
Performed by: ASCAP has not named the top performer

Marketing Defined

“If the circus is coming to town and you paint a sign saying, ‘Circus is coming to Fairgrounds Sunday’, that's ADVERTISING.

If you put the sign on the back of an elephant and walk him through the town, that’s PROMOTION

If the elephant walks through the Mayor’s flower bed, that’s PUBLICITY.

If you can get the Mayor to laugh about it, that’s PUBLIC RELATIONS.

And, if you planned the whole thing, that’s MARKETING!”

The quote is attributed to P.T. Barnum of Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus in 1871 on many online sites. However, I can't verify it with all certainty.

Saturday, December 8, 2012

Fiscal Talks Spur Charitable Giving

Interesting analysis in the 12/7/12 edition of the WSJ on a result of all the talk about the fiscal cliff.

Tax uncertainty in Washington is setting off a mad scramble among wealthy taxpayers and charities to maximize donations before the end of the year.
Their worry: The tax deduction for charitable giving, a fixture of the tax code for nearly a century, is coming under pressure as part of a broader fiscal agreement now being hammered out on Capitol Hill.

The rush shows the extent to which wrangling in Washington over deficit reduction already is affecting the way taxpayers are spending their money. In addition to rethinking their charitable giving, some taxpayers are accelerating large medical expenses, selling appreciated stock and even prepaying mortgages, financial advisers say. 

"People want to take advantage of 2012's certainty," said Benjamin Pierce, head of Vanguard Charitable, a nonprofit group affiliated with money manager Vanguard Group Inc. "Front-loading is very much on their minds."
Fidelity Charitable, an affiliate of Fidelity Investments, took in $1.2 billion for the first nine months of 2012, up 63% from the same period in 2011, while Schwab Charitable, an affiliate of Charles Schwab Corp., SCHW +2.72% recorded a 74% jump for the third quarter. Vanguard Charitable saw a 43% increase through the end of November.

The charitable deduction has been under fire from some politicians on both sides of the aisle for several years. Speaking to business leaders at the Business Roundtable in Washington on Wednesday, President Barack Obama said a complete elimination of the charitable deduction is unlikely.

The deduction, which has been part of the tax code since 1917, allows taxpayers to reduce their taxable income by giving money or other assets to certain tax-exempt groups, including churches, schools and charities.
All told, Americans donate about $300 billion each year to charity, according to a recent report by the Giving USA Foundation and the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. December is typically a big month for giving.

The possibility of a deduction limit is prompting many charities to ramp up their collection efforts.
Feeding America, a Chicago hunger-relief charity with about $1.2 billion in annual donations of cash and food, is asking donors "to consider paying forward their commitments," said donor development officer Maura Daly, adding that she already has heard from several supporters planning to do so.

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society said its fundraisers are armed with relevant information on potential tax changes when they make calls. Given the uncertainty, said donor development director Michael Osso, "we're more determined than ever to help them understand the benefits of giving right now."

The Great Commission Foundation of Campus Crusade for Christ, an Orlando evangelical group, is seeing bigger gifts than last year, in part because "we have these conversations" with donors, said Bob Hawkes, executive director of the group. "We're not tax experts, but we share resources, ask them to talk to their tax advisers and send out a weekly newsletter on Washington."

Many taxpayers are piling into "donor-advised" funds such as those run by Fidelity, Schwab and Vanguard. Such funds enable givers to donate now and secure a full deduction for 2012, while pushing decisions about charitable gifts to specific causes into the future. After money goes into such a fund, it is invested and can grow tax-free until the donor tells the sponsor which eligible nonprofits to send checks to—at which point there is no deduction.

Vanguard's Mr. Pierce estimates there is more than $43 billion in donor-advised charitable funds supervised by more than 750 large sponsors, including universities, regional foundations and independent nonprofits.

Irving Plotkin, an economist and philanthropist in Cambridge, Mass., who has had a charitable account with Vanguard for a decade, said he has tripled his donation so far this year. He added that he might donate again before year-end if Congress imposes deduction limits for 2013.

People who donate now are taking a gamble. If lawmakers don't cut the charitable deduction and allow the top tax rate to jump to 39.6% as scheduled in 2013—an unlikely but possible outcome—taking a deduction next year could be more valuable.
"I'm willing to risk that," said Mr. Plotkin.

Charities and tax advisers are urging donors to use an additional tax break—employed by Warren Buffett and other wealthy taxpayers—that could disappear or be diminished in a fiscal agreement. Under current law, donations of assets that have risen in value, such as shares of stock, often qualify for a deduction at the full market price, enabling donors to skip paying capital-gains tax on the appreciation.

With the stock market having recovered much of its losses from 2007-09 and the possibility of deduction limits next year, many advisers say now is a good time to give stock.

Elda Di Re, who advises high-net-worth clients at Ernst & Young, said charitable-gift funds are now "part of every giving conversation we have," especially with hedge-fund managers and private-equity investors. "They want to maximize the value of their gifts, so they have plan A and plan B and are ready to pull the trigger depending on what Congress decides."

On Wednesday, more than 250 nonprofit-group leaders met with members of Congress to urge them to protect the deduction.

Diana Aviv, president of Independent Sector, an association of nonprofits, said one plan floated by the White House, which would shrink the percentage of donations higher-income taxpayers could deduct from their taxes, could reduce charitable giving by $1.7 billion to $7 billion a year. Another plan, to cap all tax deductions at a specific dollar amount, could hurt giving even more, she said.
With uncertainty high, charities are pulling out all the stops.

Curt Whipple, a financial adviser in Canton, Mich., said he had lunch recently with Kent Clark, chief executive of Grace Centers of Hope, a charity to which he has been making monthly donations. "He brought up the fiscal cliff," said Mr. Whipple.

Mr. Whipple said he already intended to make an additional gift by year-end, and that the lunch hadn't persuaded him to donate more.

Mr. Clark said he is asking other donors to make their gifts before year-end as well. "We need to have a big December," he said.

Write to Laura Saunders at laura.saunders@wsj.com and Hannah Karp at hannah.karp@dowjones.com

A version of this article appeared December 7, 2012, on page A1 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Fiscal Talks Spur Charitable Giving.


Sunday, September 23, 2012

Miss Vermont 2012 Visits Brattleboro Rotary Club

Chelsea Ingram, Miss Vermont 2012, was the featured speaker at the Thursday, September 20, 2012  Brattleboro Rotary Club's luncheon meeting.  Miss Ingram spoke about heart disease prevention.  

Being president certainly has its privileges and benefits.